Meet The Team: Madeline Grant – NCIA’s Government Relations Manager
by Madeline Grant, NCIA’s Government Relations Manager
It’s funny how things just happen… one day, like any normal day, I was working the lunch shift at a restaurant called Carolina Ale House in Columbia, South Carolina. At first, I was worried about how much I would make in tips that day, as anyone with experience in the service industry can relate to, but then I started chatting with one of my tables… small talk, really. I told them how I was a sophomore at the University of South Carolina studying journalism and mass communications with a focus in public relations and a minor in women and gender studies. One man asked, “Well what do you want to do after college?” A question I thought about often but never had an answer to. He handed me his business card and asked if I was interested in politics. A few days later, I reached out, interviewed with the firm partners, and successfully scored the internship.
As I entered the political realm, I knew close to nothing but had a desire to learn as much as possible. Growing up, I was never really introduced into the world of politics as my parents didn’t say much about it – it was a whole new world to me! I attended caucus meetings, sat in the Senate and listened, followed legislation pertaining to their clients, researched, etc. My boss walked in one day and said he had an interesting project for me: to research and find everything I can about medical cannabis. I discovered so many fascinating miracle stories such as the effectiveness of medical cannabis for children with epilepsy. Seeing the great benefits and possibility, I kept thinking: why is this classified a Schedule 1 substance?
Fast forward to the classic “college graduate in search of a job” situation. I moved back home to Frederick, Maryland and started as an intern on Capitol Hill. After two months of interning, I landed a job on Capitol Hill and fell passionately in love with health issues (every staffer that went the legislative route had their assigned issues to become experts on). I began to learn more about cannabis and the detrimental effects of its Schedule 1 status.
Cannabis being classified as a Schedule 1 substance deems it to have a high potential for abuse, no currently accepted medical treatment use, and lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision. Because of this classification, we can’t fully explore the medicinal benefit that it can in fact offer.
As I started taking more meetings with cannabis advocates, lobbyists, and patients, there was one significant group that stuck with me: a group of mothers and children with debilitating chronic diseases. The mothers were there to advocate on behalf of their children who significantly benefited from CBD oil. They told me a story about a family that uprooted their entire lives for their epileptic child because CBD was the only medicine that was working to reduce the seizures. On that day, I realized how important cannabis is for patients and how it truly can make an unlivable life livable. And that was JUST CBD. Can you imagine what we could gain from the whole plant? If we had the ability to research every single component of the plant, we could begin to know the full, true potential of medical cannabis.
The Schedule 1 status of marijuana hinders research and that needs to change, but thankfully, I can help.
As the Government Relations Manager at NCIA, I passionately lobby for those patients and businesses. I’ve been at NCIA for nearly three years and slowly but surely I’ve seen a significant change in the stigma associated with cannabis on Capitol Hill. It is my job to educate members of Congress, Hill staffers, and the public on all issues the cannabis community faces. This can include anything from cannabis business getting access to banking to educating members on the injustice the war on drugs had on Americans. My job is to educate and tell your stories which I do with great honor. I’m proud to represent you and what you do in the cannabis community.
As we are at home, I would love to meet with you virtually!
As I am unable to be on Capitol Hill right now, I want to use my time to compile your stories to forward to Hill offices, so please reach out if you are able and willing to tell your story. Stay safe and healthy.
CBD Oil, the DEA, and the Law
New action from the DEA today caused a stir among hemp and CBD producers. The action – the insertion of a new rule in the Federal Register regarding cannabinoids – could have serious consequences for CBD product makers.
Is your CBD derived from hemp? Doesn’t matter to the DEA. The new extracts classification applies to all “extracts that have been derived from any plant of the genus Cannabis and which contain cannabinols and cannabidiols.” Hemp is not a separate genus. (Although it may be a separate species; lot of debate on that point.) Legally speaking, hemp is simply cannabis with no more than 0.3 percent THC content.
NCIA member Hoban Law Group produced a detailed memo responding to the DEA’s action and exploring ways that it might be challenged in court.
The fact that the DEA, an unelected government body with no legislative authority, is attempting to outlaw all cannabinoids is concerning and problematic as it pertains to portions of the plant not legally defined as “marihuana,” and as it pertains to lawfully cultivated and processed Farm Bill-compliant industrial hemp.
We’ll continue to monitor the activity around the DEA’s new rule and keep you updated with additional information.
Senate Subcommittee Just Says Yes… To A Hearing
by Michelle Rutter, Government Relations Coordinator
Earlier this month, the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism held a hearing entitled ”Researching the Potential Medical Benefits and Risks of Marijuana,” which was presided over by Sens. Graham (R-SC), Whitehouse (D-RI), Klobuchar (D-MN), Grassley (R-IA), and Blumenthal (D-CT). Witnesses included Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), federal officials from NIDA (National Institute on Drug Abuse), NIH (National Institute of Health), and the FDA (Food and Drug Administration), and members of the medical and legal community. For more information on the hearing and the witnesses, click here.
The first panel included Sens. Gillibrand (D-NY) and Booker (D-NJ), who both testified on the benefits medical cannabis can provide and noted that they are both original co-sponsors of the Compassionate Access, Research Expansion, and Respect States Act (S. 683), better known as the CARERS Act. Some of the key points that the Senators mentioned during the hearing included removing cannabis from its designation as a Schedule I drug, dismantling NIDA’s monopoly on cannabis used for research, and the urgent need to ease restrictions to allow for more research.
The next panel was comprised of two government agency officials: the Director of the Division of Extramural Research at the National Institute on Drug Abuse at the National Institutes of Health, and a doctor who is Deputy Center Director for Regulatory Programs at the FDA. Both panelists repeatedly stressed the importance of continued research into the therapeutic and medicinal benefits of cannabis, as well as the development of cannabis-based drugs. The FDA official also highlighted that the DEA is currently reviewing a recommendation on cannabis’s designation as a Schedule I drug, and the decision is pending.
The third panel included two doctors and a lawyer representing the DEA. The first doctor noted that THC and CBD do have therapeutic value but stressed the need for more research to determine if/how to mitigate any negative side effects of medical cannabis use. The second doctor on the panel is a well-known cannabis opponent, whose testimony sounded more like “reefer-madness” than a Senate hearing on cannabis in 2016. The lawyer present gave a moderately short statement, but did state that the DEA regulations around Schedule I drugs already provide a great deal of flexibility for research and can and are waived to allow legitimate studies and that the reclassification of cannabis to Schedule II would have little impact on the barriers to research – a statement that most in the cannabis community would strongly disagree with.
During questioning, Sen. Graham (R-SC) asked if the witnesses believed that cannabis should be re-scheduled as a Schedule II drug. Both the FDA official and the NIDA/NIH official weighed in, and with the same conclusion: more research is needed in order to make that determination. Chairman Graham also asked how to best facilitate medical cannabis research, which was answered by the DEA’s lawyer, who responded that the “flexibility” in the regulatory system could allow for it.
What does it mean?
Past Congressional hearings regarding cannabis have typically focused on the harms, not the benefits, of marijuana. As such, it’s a positive sign that the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism, Lindsey Graham (R-SC), held a hearing on the potential therapeutic benefits of medical cannabis. The main takeaway from the hearing was the desire from all parties – Senators, government officials, and medical professionals alike – for more research on cannabis, its compounds, and its effects.
Regardless, this hearing shows the progress that the industry has made in Congress and the momentum building nationwide behind the cannabis movement.
This site uses cookies. By using this site or closing this notice, you agree to the use of cookies and our privacy policy.
It’s funny how things just happen… one day, like any normal day, I was working the lunch shift at a restaurant called Carolina Ale House in Columbia, South Carolina. At first, I was worried about how much I would make in tips that day, as anyone with experience in the service industry can relate to, but then I started chatting with one of my tables… small talk, really. I told them how I was a sophomore at the University of South Carolina studying journalism and mass communications with a focus in public relations and a minor in women and gender studies. One man asked, “Well what do you want to do after college?” A question I thought about often but never had an answer to. He handed me his business card and asked if I was interested in politics. A few days later, I reached out, interviewed with the firm partners, and successfully scored the internship.