House Rules Committee Weighs In On Cannabis Appropriations Amendments
By Morgan Fox, NCIA’s Director of Media Relations
The process of approving the federal budget is moving full steam ahead, with the House Rules Committee considering several amendments related to cannabis to a series of funding bills this week. Amendments that pass this committee move on to a full vote on the House floor.
In terms of overall cannabis policy reform, the most prominent amendment is one that would prevent the Department of Justice from using funds to interfere with state adult-use and medical cannabis programs or target people and businesses that are in compliance with state cannabis laws. This amendment was offered by bipartisan congressional cannabis champions Reps. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), Tom McClintock (R-CA), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) and Barbara Lee (D-CA). The amendment was ruled in order Wednesday and will proceed to a vote, possibly as soon as this week.
Even though the DOJ has generally been respecting state cannabis laws in recent years, passage of this amendment in the final federal budget would add the force of law to that policy for the next fiscal year, providing peace of mind for tens of thousands of regulated cannabis businesses and millions of consumers across the country. This would also add significant momentum to congressional efforts to remove cannabis from the schedule of controlled substances and regulate it at the federal level in separate stand-alone legislation.
Provisions to prevent the DOJ solely from targeting state-legal medical cannabis programs and providers have been approved by Congress every year since 2014. With public support for medical cannabis at roughly 90%, these protections have become mostly a non-issue in Congress and have been included in the original base language of the relevant House appropriations bills since 2019.
The amendment extending those protections to state adult-use programs was approved by the House in the budget votes in 2019 and 2020. Unfortunately, it did not receive the same support in the Senate and was not included in the final funding packages approved by the previous Congress.
An amendment that would remove the renewal of medical cannabis program protections from this legislation, flying in the face of long-supported policy and unnecessarily taking up lawmakers’ time, was also introduced by Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-CA) and ruled in order.
Rep. LaMalfa, a staunch prohibitionist, has also introduced several amendments to appropriations bills to increase DEA funding for eradication efforts. He made headlines recently when his office released videos of him joining law enforcement in bulldozing outdoor cultivation sites in Siskiyou County, California while grandstanding for the camera and ripping off quotes from the film Apocalypse Now. These sites were located in primarily Hmong communities, a Southeast Asian ethnic diaspora that alleges that the county has prevented its members from obtaining cannabis licenses and prevented water shipments to their communities with serious harm to the quality of life there. LaMalfa’s behavior in these videos is particularly offensive given that many Hmong fled their homes to settle in the United States during and following the Vietnam War after facing persecution for supporting America in that conflict.
Unfortunately, some positive cannabis amendments were ruled out of order by the committee this week and will not be voted upon in this legislation. Delegate Norton offered a pair of provisions that would have prevented the Dept. of Housing and Urban Development from using funds to punish residents of federally assisted housing for state-legal cannabis use in adult-use and medical states, respectively. These reforms are incredibly important, as people living in federal housing can be and are frequently evicted from their homes if they or anyone in their household exercises their legal rights or uses the medicine that works best for them. This leaves many people with no place to legally use cannabis, leading to increased public consumption in low-income communities and continued racial disparities in arrests and citations.
On the positive side, an amendment from Rep. Kurt Schrader (D-OR) to highlight the need for the Food and Drug Administration to establish regulations for CBD products was also ruled in order and approved.
Last week, another bad amendment, introduced by Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-AZ), to remove language from the original legislation that would allow federal funding for universities that are conducting cannabis research was ruled in order but voted down in the House.
The House appropriations bills have a broad range of other cannabis provisions related to topics like banking reform, research, law enforcement funding and grant programs, federal employment guidelines, and allowing the District of Columbia to finally regulate cannabis after it was legalized by voters in 2014. We’ll get into these in more detail in the coming weeks as we get closer to a full vote in the House. Stay tuned!
A Different Kind Of Season: Gearing Up For Appropriations
by Morgan Fox, NCIA’s Director of Media Relations
It’s that time again on Capitol Hill: appropriations season, when Congress determines how to spend – or not spend – your tax dollars for the next year. As you can imagine, this year will be unlike any in recent memory as a cash-strapped nation struggles with how to weather the economic storm caused by the pandemic while finding the funds to support important government functions and programs. Appropriations are also a time when our champions in the legislature are once again introducing sensible cannabis policy reforms through an avenue that historically has been effective. Many of these reforms would actually save taxpayers money!
What’s in:
- For the second year in a row, language that prevents the Department of Justice from using resources to target state-legal medical cannabis programs was included in the original language of the commerce, justice and science funding bill. If approved or continued, this would be the sixth year that Congress has told federal law enforcement to leave medical cannabis patients and providers alone.
- Language that would prevent the Department of Treasury from using resources to penalize banks and other financial institutions for working with legal cannabis businesses was included in the financial services and general government funding bill. While not as comprehensive as the SAFE Banking Act, which was approved by the House last year and included in its most recent coronavirus relief bill, this provision would give financial services providers more assurances needed to encourage working with the cannabis industry and would help improve public health and safety.
- A measure that would protect public colleges and universities from being denied federal funds due to conducting research on cannabis was included in the bill funding agencies related to education, labor, health, and human services. Many institutions have cited the potential loss of funding as a major discouragement to research. This also makes it easier for universities to study cannabis products available in regulated state markets. An additional provision to this bill also prevents federally funded schools from engaging in any advocacy in support of making any Schedule I substances legal.
- Additional funding would be made available through the agriculture and FDA appropriations legislation for research, regulation, and consumer protection related to hemp, CBD, and other cannabis components.
- Language that asks the Office of Personnel Management to reconsider allowing federal employees to legally consume cannabis in accordance with applicable state laws without fear of retribution was added to the financial services and general government funding bill. While this is non-binding, it would hopefully encourage the federal government to review its employment practices and not punish law-abiding employees who choose to use cannabis outside of work.
What’s not:
- A provision that has prevented the District of Columbia from regulating cannabis after voters there approved a ballot initiative making adult use legal in 2014 was left out of the new spending package. So long as it is not added again in either the House or Senate, the nation’s capital will finally be able to fully carry out the intent of the voters more than half a decade after residents decided this issue. Currently, adult possession and limited home cultivation are permitted in the District, but non-medical sales are not.
What could be added:
- While the spending bill that funds the Department of Veterans Affairs did not originally contain any cannabis-related provisions, supporters are leaving open the possibility that language which would allow doctors in the VA system to recommend medical cannabis to their patients in accordance with state laws to be included before the process is complete.
- Reps. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) and Tom McClintock (R-CA), joined by Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), are considering the introduction of a rider which would prevent the Department of Justice from interfering in any state cannabis program, extending the previously-approved protections for medical cannabis programs to regulated adult-use systems that exist in 10 states and counting. This legislation was approved in last year’s House spending bills but was not included in the final legislation.
It is difficult to tell what will happen with the various appropriations bills this session. There is still time for members of the House to amend funding legislation. While the House is moving forward with these bills, the Senate has yet to introduce any of their own. However, the upper chamber is in the process of considering a new coronavirus relief package. NCIA has been working with that chamber to have cannabis banking reform language included in that bill as it was in the last relief bill approved by the House, but it is by no means certain at this point. It is also possible that Congress won’t reach an agreement on the new spending bills and will simply decide to continue with the prior year’s budget outlays, which would at least continue medical cannabis protections for another year.
Stay tuned for more updates and be sure to join us next Wednesday, July 29, for an exclusive members-only fireside chat with NCIA’s dedicated government relations team!
Follow NCIA
Newsletter
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Instagram
News & Resource Topics
–
This Just In
How THCa Vapes Are Changing Consumer
Announcing NCIA’s 2026-2028 Board of Directors