NCIA’s Safe Vaping Task Force Submits Testimony

Last week, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) identified a probable proximate cause of recent vaping injuries and deaths. Simultaneously, the United States Senate (HELP Committee) noticed a hearing for tomorrow (Wednesday) on the vaping crisis, where CDC officials will testify.

NCIA Policy Council’s Safe Vaping Task Force has submitted testimony for the record, which can be found here.

For weeks, NCIA’s Policy Council has been calling for de-scheduling and regulation at the federal level to displace the illegal, untested, unregulated illicit market. It’s time for Congress to act. We can no longer sit by and watch as people are sickened by unregulated, untested, and dangerous products from the illicit market.

Read NCIA’s Submitted Testimony

Member Blog: The Value Of Cannabis Patents To Cannabis Startups

by Dr. Dariush Adli, Adli Law Group

As of now, ten states have legalized recreational cannabis. Twenty-one other states allow medicinal use of cannabis, many of which are expected to legalize recreational cannabis in the near future. Investment in cannabis-related businesses totaled almost $10 billion in 2018 and is expected to top $16 billion this year.

Patent Protection

A patent, and the exclusivity it provides its owners can play a key role in assuring success for cannabis-focused businesses. However, protection and enforcement of cannabis-related patents faces unique challenges, since, despite its recent and spreading success at the state level, cannabis is still illegal at the federal level, while most intellectual property protection, as well as enforcement, is federal. Nevertheless, cannabis-focused businesses can benefit from patent protection.

Patents protect inventions, which meet the required criteria of utility, novelty, and non-obviousness. The four main categories of patents, including Utility Patents, Design Patents, Plant Patents, and Business Method Patents, are available to protect cannabis-related inventions. Despite illegality under federal law, the USPTO has been issuing patents for cannabis-related inventions for decades; a trend, which has significantly accelerated with the spread of legalization at the state level.

Recent examples of issued cannabis utility patents include USPN 10,028,987, issued on July 24, 2018, entitled “cannabis-infused milk,” and USPN 10,206,888, issued February 19, 2019, entitled “A cannabis-based therapeutic product for the treatment of chronic pain produced by separating hash resin from plant material of the cannabis plant.”

Plant patents protect new varieties of plants. USPN PP27,475, issued on December 20, 2016, is entitled “cannabis plant named ‘Ecuadorian Sativa’.” According to its specification, “The new strain has energizing and motivating psychoactive effects.”

Design patents protect ornamental, aesthetic and non-functional aspects of useful products. Design patents can protect cannabis-related products such as smoking paraphernalia and containers. For example, USPN D844,892, issued on April 2, 2019, issued for a “cannabis container,” and USPN D798,739, issued on October 3, 2017, is directed to a “cannabis storing container with individual tear-off lids.”

With issued cannabis patents multiplying, enforcement efforts have followed suit. Because patent enforcement disputes are predominantly within the jurisdiction of federal courts and cannabis remains illegal at the federal level, there have been questions as to whether a patent suit can be maintained in Federal court. The answer appears to be affirmative. Following several patent infringement cases, which were filed but then voluntarily dismissed prior to substantive court action, Cannabis Corporation sued Pure Hemp Collective, Inc. in federal court in Colorado. That case is still pending and recently survived a motion for partial summary judgment filed by Defendant Pure Hemp Collective Inc., where the court found that the asserted claims were subject matter eligible for patent protection.

The trend in the issuance of cannabis patents by the USPTO and enforcement by federal courts presents a unique opportunity to entrepreneurs, businesses, and investors to participate in the growing market on the “ground floor.”


Dr. Dariush Adli, Ph.D., Esq., is the Founder and President of ADLI Law Group. Recognized as a premier strategist in patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret, and complex commercial disputes. Dr. Adli is widely sought after by businesses large and small, seeking effective strategies for protecting their valuable intellectual property assets. In that effort, Dr. Adli partners with businesses to identify their protectable intellectual property assets and to develop customized legal strategies, which are consistent with the businesses’ goals, resources, and risk tolerance.

ADLI Law Group is a multi-service law firm providing legal services in the areas of Intellectual Property (Patent, Trademark, Copyright and Trade Secret), Corporate and Commercial Transactions, Labor & Employment, Media and Entertainment, Real Estate, Construction, Products Liability, and Cannabis. Since its inception in 2010, ADLI Law’s mission and focus has been on providing quality client service and maximizing the value of its legal services to clients. We appreciate the trust and confidence our clients’ place in us, which has earned us a place on the highly coveted and competitive Los Angeles Business Journal’s list of the top 200 law firms in Los Angeles county.

 

Video Member Spotlight: AgriScience Laboratories

In this month’s video member spotlight, step into the cannabis and hemp testing labs of AgriScience Laboratories, based in Denver, Colorado. AgriScience Labs was created as a merger of two laboratories: CMT Laboratories and Terra Health Care Labs. CMT had been operating since 2011 and was known as a leader in science and customer service during that time. Terra Health Care Laboratories (THCL) was the first certified testing lab in the United States, and they were known for state of the art equipment, methods, and facilities. Learn more about the company’s testing methods and values from Frank Traylor, Founder & CEO, and Laboratory Director Claire Ohman.

Member Blog: Stop The Illicit Market With Profitability, Save Lives 

by Phil Gibson, AEssenseGrows

By now, we’ve all seen the concerning vape cartridge illnesses and deaths across various states. While the exact cause is still being determined, our industry has an opportunity to step up our game. So the question we must ask ourselves is: how can the cannabis industry help to prevent potentially dangerous illicit market cannabis sales?

The everyday consumer is seduced by lower-cost alternatives and some turn to the grey market with an assumption of safety. “If the price is half as much, why not?” wonders the consumer. Unfortunately, tragic examples slapped us back to reality and we are now seeing all too clearly the downsides of the laissez-faire approach that feeds the grey market. Low cost is good, but people are dying. This is where our crisis is real. 

Safety protocols, procedures, regulations, and oversight, applied to the old methods of production, lead to increased costs that are duplicated on the way through the channel. High taxes multiply that effect, serving as a barrier to the consumer. The illicit market circumvents the bureaucracy and offers a lower cost that meets consumer demand at an increased risk. 

Lower Production Costs = Lower Costs For The Consumer

As the end of cannabis prohibition nears, we have to remember that long before we had added regulations and government overhead, proponents of legal cannabis emphasized the medicinal value of the plant, for treating everything from chronic pain to post-traumatic stress syndrome. What started as a simple plant that grew outdoors with free sun and water has evolved, with numerous controls added to regulate, generate tax revenue, and improve the odds that this new medicine is safe. As well-meaning as those precautions are, they have added significant cost to the wonder drug through legal channels. Our best hope for migrating consumers away from dangerous shortcut products is to get a handle on production cost and make it easier for cultivators to follow the rules and enjoy profitability. 

It pains all of us when we see the recent spate of illnesses — even deaths — increasingly associated with vaping cannabis, despite the fact that the majority of health issues appear to stem from the illicit market. If we don’t fix this, the market will be severely impacted by either consumer avoidance or government fiat. I’m proud to see that NCIA is taking a lead role in communications around this critical issue and in the fight to deschedule cannabis and enacting federal regulations at a reasonable cost, protecting consumers from potentially dangerous illicit cannabis distribution. 

Raise The Quality, Lower The Cost Of Production

Safety, of course, has been and always will be a key concern of the legal cannabis industry. But as our industry grows up and competitive pressures bear down, we can’t afford to shortcut our responsibilities. Running a grow operation is full of potentially harmful contaminants that can strike at any time. Producers need to choose ways to protect their investments with safe operational procedures and new technologies that guarantee both safe and superior products for our customers. At a lower cost! 

Where there is a need and a business opportunity, innovation will rise to the challenge. The vape crisis points to an urgent need for low-cost yields and profits for legal cannabis producers. This can be achieved through a highly controlled aeroponic approach for consistent, pure, clean yields that exceed regulatory and medicinal requirements. Using advanced technology, the cost of production can be reduced to as low as $0.30/gram, and the result is legal cannabis that can enter the channel at much lower cost at levels where the illicit market can’t compete, and legal producers can profit. 

Fully automated environments, nutrients, pH, air, lighting, humidity, temperature — are all monitored and adjusted through software-controlled electromechanical systems in a soil-free environment. With minimal labor required, contamination risks are low, natural contaminants won’t take root and heavy metals and pesticides can be excluded from the environment. 

Indoor aeroponic grow systems represent a sea change for many longtime growers and modernizing the industry means new opportunities. New technology replaces labor-intensive efforts with cruise control automation in an efficient climate-controlled environment. Cutting corners proves to be costly while the rewards for doing it right are considerable: precision fast-turning superior yields — and a dramatic reduction in the potential for contaminants to wreak havoc and impact safety. 

We all know that risk is part of any business, and that a key element of our jobs is to reduce risk and cost for our customers. Growing in a highly controlled indoor environment at lower cost to the consumer can dramatically mitigate your risks so you, and your customers, can breathe easier, and we can ensure cannabis remains safe. 


Phil Gibson, Vice President of Marketing has 30 years of sales, marketing, and channel experience with 3 years at AEssenseGrows, and is known as the creator of the WEBENCH online design environment now owned by Texas Instruments. Previously, Phil held executive marketing positions at Infineon, TI, and National Semiconductor. With 8 patents in web technology, Phil is an expert in digital marketing and built his first web site in 1995. Phil holds an MBA from the University of Southern California and a BSEE from UC Davis.

 

Member Blog: Sustainable, Indoor-Grown Cannabis Starts with LEDs

By Andrew Myers, President & CEO of ProGrowTech

Despite cannabis’s down-to-earth appeal, it hasn’t been as friendly to the earth as one might assume. But cannabis growers have always been resourceful, and with recent developments in technology and improved growing methods – including full-spectrum LED grow lights – the cannabis industry is becoming increasingly sustainable. The end results? A healthier environment, better products and a notable cost reduction. It’s a win-win-win.

Cannabis’s Carbon-Intensive Past

Between staggering electricity usage, a ballooning carbon footprint, a habitually gratuitous use of pesticides and toxic runoff decimating local ecosystems, the cannabis industry hasn’t been the best steward of the environment. As more states pass adult-use and medical laws across the country, this seemingly blameless plant has come under scrutiny from environmentalists, consumers and policy-makers alike. 

Evan Mills, Ph.D., is regarded as one of the leading minds in cannabis industry sustainability issues. A California-based energy and climate change scientist, he authored a landmark and frequently cited report in 2012, “The carbon footprint of indoor Cannabis production,” highlighting the cannabis industry’s not-so-green track record. The report devotes a few hefty paragraphs to indoor lighting needs at cultivation sites. Primary takeaways include: 

  • Indoor cannabis production requires lighting levels 500-times greater than that recommended for reading. 
  • Cultivation sites power densities are measured at 200 W/m2, on par with modern datacenters. 
  • Grow facilities nationwide consume the same amount of electricity as two million average American homes. 
  • A single cannabis cigarette, according to Mills’ calculations, is equivalent to 3 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions.

The data is clear: without adjusting equipment and techniques, the cannabis industry was on track to becoming one of the largest carbon emitters in the world. And amidst growing calls for improved business transparency and environmentally conscious methods (that have only gotten louder in recent years), cannabis businesses were desperate for solutions that matched performance with sustainability. 

The LEDs of Today

Many outdated lighting technologies like HPS and fluorescents consume exorbitant amounts of energy for sub-par output, run hot (and therefore place additional pressure on environmental controls like HVAC and AC) and tend to burn out quickly. These technologies can leave many growers wondering if it’s worth the trouble – and encourage them to make the switch to LEDs.

While LEDs have certainly been around for a while, they’ve gained traction among cannabis growers more recently. At one time, large installations of LEDs needed at commercial grow operations were highly cost prohibitive, only allowing the biggest enterprises to reap the benefits. But, over time, LEDs have become increasingly affordable and accessible to smaller businesses, start-ups and hobbyists. Moreover, the technology has improved drastically. 

Today’s cutting-edge LED grow lights come with built-in features leading to better performance paired with lower costs and emissions for the modern grower.

  • Unparalleled Efficacy and Efficiency
    LED grow lights today are able to deliver unmatched uniformity, ensuring every plant in your canopy receives adequate photosynthetically active radiation. They also use less energy while delivering plenty of brightness – meaning you’ll cut electricity costs and emissions without seeing a dip in performance.
     
  • Full-Spectrum Light and Spectral Tuning
    Wish you could bring the sun indoors? Invest in LEDs – they’re the closest thing to sunlight you can find because they deliver full-spectrum light. Your plants can benefit from the full range of spectrum as they would in their natural environment. Further, features like spectral tuning give cultivators ultimate control, allowing them to elicit certain biological responses, hasten flowering and shorten the growing cycle altogether.
     
  • Vertical Racking
    This capability, made available with some modern LEDs, can double or even triple your harvests without investing in additional square footage. Vertical racking allows growers to use their spaces in the most efficient way possible, resulting in verdant, multi-level gardens.
     
  • Automation
    Automating light cycles, watering and even nutrient distribution can cut down on labor-intensive tasks and human error that can result in additional, unnecessary energy usage. By pre-programming the necessary functions of your grow, growers are given peace-of-mind and can focus on other important tasks that require more of a human touch.
     
  • Low Heat Profile and On-Board Dimming
    A huge selling point for growers of all kinds, LEDs have a much lower heat profile than other lighting technologies. They present less of a risk for heat stress, reduce reliance on other environmental controls and can be placed much closer to the plant canopy (a plus when vertical racking!). On-board dimming is a helpful feature as well: growers can create an artificial sunrise and sunset to gently ease their plants into light-dark cycles and prevent spikes in both temperature and humidity.
     
  • Improved Durability
    LEDs are built to last, another selling point for environmentally conscious cultivators looking to cut down on waste. If you’re in the market for some new efficient grow lights, look for LEDs that are built with industrial-grade materials and come with the IP66 or IP65 waterproofing certification. 

 

Looking Toward a Bright, Green Future

Cannabis has become a regular facet of countless American lives. It helps people relax and de-stress, mitigate crippling pain and calm seizures. In 2018, the Pew Research Center reported that 62% of Americans are in favor of legalizing cannabis. The once-villainized plant, long at the center of fear-mongering campaigns like reefer madness and gateway drugs, is now widely enjoyed by everyone from politicians to grandparents to entrepreneurs to professional athletes. It’s not going anywhere any time soon. 

That means that cannabis industry professionals have a responsibility to produce cannabis with sustainable methods – and LEDs are a great place to start. Not only do LEDs help shrink your business’s carbon footprint, they can also save you money in the long run and boost profits. There are countless growers today who prefer using LEDs, and it’s pretty easy to understand why.


Andrew Myers is President and CEO of ProGrowTech, which helps commercial horticulture operations increase profitability, yield and energy efficiency with industry-leading LED lighting systems. For more information, visit progrowtech.com

 

 

 

 

Apply For A Scholarship To The Northeast Cannabis Business Conference By December 1!

In an effort to create a more diverse and inclusive industry, we are thrilled to announce that NCIA in conjunction with the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Committee has opened applications for its scholarship fund for qualified cannabis executives.

NCIA is excited to have the opportunity to offer 30 applicants a complimentary pass to join us at the Northeast Cannabis Business Conference this February 19-20 in Boston, MA. If you are a minority in an executive cannabis position, please take a moment to fill out the application. We look forward to seeing you in Boston!

The scholarship application period closes on December 1, so get your application in today!

APPLY FOR A SCHOLARSHIP

Applications are due by Midnight PST, December 1, 2019. Awardees will be notified on December 16, 2019. Scholarship recipients will receive complimentary passes to the conference. Scholarship recipients will need to cover & arrange their own travel and lodging needed to attend the event.

Have questions? Please reach out to kaliko@thecannabisindustry.org

Webinar Recording: The Veterinary Cannabis Industry – What to Know And What’s For Show

In case you missed the live webinar this week, watch this recording to learn more about the medical applications in veterinary medicine. NCIA has proudly partnered with one of the leading figures in the veterinary cannabis space, Dr. Zac Pilossoph, a nationally recognized veterinarian to shed light on the veterinary cannabis industry. He provides a general overview of where the veterinary cannabis industry currently stands, briefly touching on endocannabinoid system comparative anatomy, proposed clinical applications, and current rules and regulations.

 

Download The PowerPoint Slides Here

 

NCIA’s Safe Vaping Task Force Latest News And Recommendations

by Andrew Kline, NCIA’s Director of Public Policy

In response to the recent wave of vape-related illnesses, NCIA’s Policy Council has formed a Safe Vaping Task Force. The purpose of the task force is to unify the industry by communicating clearly in response to press reports and state/federal governmental actions, and by clearly articulating the state-legal cannabis industry’s obligation to act with integrity as responsible actors. The task force is publishing summaries of recent developments and the cannabis industry’s response, producing and publishing a white paper on safe vaping, unifying the industry’s response, and engaging federal and state/local governments as appropriate. Members of the task force include medical doctors, scientists, cannabis license holders, and relevant ancillary businesses. 

Here’s the latest about safe vaping from the news this past week:

  • As of October 22, 2019, 1,604 (up from 1,479) lung injury cases associated with the use of vaping products have been reported to CDC from 49 states (all except Alaska), the District of Columbia, and 1 U.S. territory. 34 deaths (up from 33) have been confirmed in 24 states. The CDC is updating this information every Thursday. The good news is that it appears that illnesses and deaths are slowing down. The bad news is that we still don’t know the proximate cause and the federal government has not communicated a timeline by which we will have better information.

  • Since the specific compound or ingredient causing lung injury is not yet known, the CDC continues to recommend refraining from the use of all vaping products. NCIA’s Safe Vaping Task Force is hopeful that the CDC and FDA will act swiftly to ascertain the proximate cause of the vaping problem, expose and address those specific issues head-on, and communicate clearly the specific dangers to the American consumer.

  • Although cannabis has only been legal in Massachusetts for less than a year, the state is already putting on the breaks. Massachusetts is the first state to ban the sale of all vape products, unleashing a major financial blow to the state’s marijuana businesses and sending consumers to the dangerous, unregulated and untested illicit market. Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker secured approval from the Public Health Council to issue an emergency regulation to maintain the statewide retail ban on the sale of all vaping products. A local judge simultaneously issued a ruling allowing for medical cannabis patients to purchase crushed flower for use in vaporizers. The emergency regulation keeps the vaping ban in place while also creating a three-month timeline for rulemaking and public hearings.

  • California lawmakers are also considering an outright ban of all vape products, including nicotine and THC. This potential action comes on the heels of Charlie Baker, Governor of Massachusetts, banning all vaping products for four months.

  • Marijuana became legal for adults over 21 in Colorado in 2014, yet even with 5 to 6 years of regulatory experience, Colorado has not banned all vape products. Instead, Colorado has conducted public hearings to determine what specific products or ingredients should be banned, based on scientific evidence. Colorado is in the final stages of finalizing permanent rules for adoption of a prohibited ingredients list (due Nov 5). It should also be noted that Colorado has not attributed any deaths to THC vaping, an indication that the state regulatory regime is working.

  • A judge in Utah ruled on Monday that the state cannot immediately ban flavored e-cigarette products. The state had justified emergency restrictions on flavored nicotine by arguing that they were a gateway to vaping THC products. This leaves the state with a 120-day rule-making process.

NCIA Task Force Recommendations

  • NCIA’s Safe Vaping Task Force believes that a more thoughtful approach based on science, like the one undertaken by Colorado, will yield better results for policymakers and patients alike.

  • NCIA continues to advocate for descheduling, federal oversight, regulation, and standardized testing.

  • NCIA recommends that manufacturers avoid untested additives and flavorants.

  • NCIA recommends that when creating novel formulations, manufacturers conduct a scientific analysis that leverages the knowledge base of other inhalation products. 

Andrew Kline is the Director of Public Policy for the National Cannabis Industry Association and Chair of the Policy Council’s Safe Vaping Task Force. 

Committee Blog: Vaping-Related Illness – Applying Lessons Learned From The E-cig Market

by Ramon Alarcon, Wellness Insight Technologies, Inc.
NCIA’s Cannabis Manufacturing Committee

THE ISSUE

In recent weeks, a growing number of respiratory illness cases associated with nicotine or cannabis vaporizer cartridges have been reported, leading to increasing concern among cannabis cartridge consumers, regulators, and medical experts. The vast majority of these reports are linked to cartridges that were produced and obtained in the illicit and unregulated market, or that were adulterated by consumers. The small number of cases that have so far been associated with legal cannabis products have not shown definitive links to those specific products. 

Furthermore, similar cases of respiratory illness have not been reported in Europe, where the regulations governing vapor products are different. Even if, as we suspect, it is confirmed that the source of the current problem is limited to illicit-market products, there are valuable lessons to be learned to ensure the future safety of licensed vapor products and preserve our ability to promote vapor products as a viable and beneficial method of consuming cannabis.

Although cannabis vaporizers and nicotine e-cigs are not the same, there are important commonalities that we can learn from given that the nicotine e-cig market has been around for over a decade. First, it is essential to acknowledge the differences. Although some people view all vaping through the same lens, vaping cannabis and nicotine are as different as drinking alcohol and coffee. The formulations are vastly different in their chemical compositions, and usage patterns of cannabis consumption are far less intensive than those of nicotine e-cigs, which tend to be used many times throughout the day. Notwithstanding those differences, the principles of operation are the same; a heating element is generally used to aerosolize a stored liquid without combustion.

THE RISK

Moreover, in both cannabis and nicotine cartridges, the target active ingredient is typically combined in formulation with other organic compounds. These include glycerol (VG) and propylene glycol (PG) that are more commonly used in nicotine-containing cartridges and dictate the viscosity of the liquid. And flavorants, typically terpenes in the case of cannabis, are included in the formulation to provide particular taste and aroma characteristics.

Nicotine e-cigs have had numerous public health concern moments, some real and some manufactured, but one particular issue is especially illustrative to cannabis manufacturers. In the early days of e-cigs, some smaller e-cig manufacturers added diacetyl to their formulations in order to create flavored e-liquids with buttery notes. Those manufacturers assumed diacetyl to be safe because it is classified as GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) by the FDA (we eat it on our popcorn for goodness sake). Nevertheless, that GRAS classification was provided for ingestion, not inhalation. In fact, diacetyl had already been discovered to cause bronchiolitis obliterans, also known as “popcorn lung,” in popcorn factory workers in the early 2000s. And although no one was reported to have been hospitalized or died, the discovery of diacetyl in nicotine vapor products cast a cloud over the entire e-cig industry, even for those companies who employed scientists, practiced good product stewardship and developed internal lists of ingredients that led them to only include ingredients that had low inhalation toxicity risk profiles. This example illustrates that it is in our interest to ensure that all cannabis vapor product manufacturers understand that compounds that are characterized as GRAS are not necessarily safe for inhalation purposes and that an additional level of risk analysis must be performed.

THE SOLUTION

We must ensure vapor product safety because the potential of cannabis vapor products to deliver the necessary medicine to patients without the harmful byproducts of combustion must not be undermined by industry missteps or the loss of public trust. Again, using nicotine e-cigs as an example, we know that vaporization can eliminate the byproducts of the combustion of plant materials. In one study, approximately 1,000 times less harmful chemicals like carbon monoxide, formaldehyde, and acetaldehyde were measured in e-cig vapor when compared to combusted cigarette smoke¹. Designed with the proper materials, protocols, and formulations, nicotine vapor products can have a very low-risk profile relative to combusted cigarettes. In fact, one nicotine vapor product has been evaluated as low risk enough to have been approved by the MHRA (UK equivalent of the FDA), thus adding to the evidence that, generally speaking, vaporization can be considered safer than combustion. Of course, confirmatory studies need to be done with cannabis but combined with the ability of vapor products to deliver fast-acting, precise doses of formulations that can be tailored to an individual’s needs, the importance of vaporized cannabis as a low-risk method of consumption is real.

With this in mind, we, as an industry, must develop standards and best practices. Doing so will build consumer trust while also providing guardrails that still allow for innovation. Other industries have done precisely this, including the fragrance and food additive industries. Moreover, if we do not develop our standards and only react to state regulations, which can tend to lag, we run a higher risk of similar problems in the future. A few simple principles can be applied to this problem.

  1. Test what goes into your body. In the case of vapor products, that is the vapor. In other words, we should test the aerosol, not just the liquid that goes into the cartridge. Labs in the e-cig industry already do this type of testing, and the methods can easily be adapted to cannabis products.

  2. We should develop a list of analytes that have low inhalation toxicity risk profiles.

  3. Stick close to what nature gave us. People have been smoking cannabis for thousands of years, and we have not seen similar health problems. As a matter of fact, we can say that the risk profile for cannabinoids and terpenes in the amounts typically consumed via smoking cannabis is low². However, we do know that some compounds that naturally occur in cannabis can pose a safety risk at high enough concentrations. So until we have more data on inhalation toxicity for all terpenes and minor cannabinoids, we should practice caution when creating novel formulations. In other words, try to remain close to the amounts found natively in the plant in order to preserve the same risk profile.

  4. Whether or not required by state regulations, be transparent, and list all ingredients. This will not only help consumers better understand what ingredients are safe — it will help capture their long term trust.

________________________________________

1 – Rana Tayyarah, Gerald A. Long, Comparison of select analytes in aerosol from e-cigarettes with smoke from conventional cigarettes and with ambient air, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (July 31, 2014)

2 – Pletcher, et al., Association Between Marijuana Exposure and Pulmonary Function over 20 Years, 307 JAMA 173 (Jan. 2012). 

Update From NCIA’s Safe Vaping Task Force

by Andrew Kline, NCIA’s Director of Public Policy

In response to the vaping crisis, NCIA’s Policy Council has formed a Safe Vaping Task Force. The purpose of the task force is to unify the industry by communicating clearly in response to press reports and state/federal governmental actions, and clearly articulating the state-legal cannabis industry’s obligation to act with integrity as responsible actors. The task force will be publishing summaries of recent developments and the cannabis industry’s response, producing and publishing a white paper on safe vaping, unifying the industry’s response, and engaging federal and state/local governments as appropriate. Members of the task force include medical doctors, scientists, cannabis license holders, and relevant ancillary businesses.

Here’s the latest about safe vaping from the news this week:

  • The New York Times reported on October 21, 2019 that while the government and researchers have expended significant resources into studying nicotine delivery devices, federal law has not allowed research into the health effects of cannabis because it is classified as a controlled substance with a high potential for abuse. Therefore, we don’t have much scientific knowledge about what THC vaping does to the lungs. The Times report added that even in states where cannabis is legal, counterfeit vape cartridges (vape carts) are cheaper than the regulated, licensed, tested and taxed products. 
  • The Boston Globe reported on October 21, 2019 that a state court judge ruled that the four month ban on nicotine vapes by Governor Charlie Baker was unconstitutional because it did not allow for input from affected businesses and the public. The Court ruled that nicotine vape sales must resume on Monday unless the Baker Administration submits the nicotine ban for consideration as a formal emergency regulation before then. The decision did not impact THC vapes. 
  • The Senate International Narcotics Control Caucus will convene this week Wednesday, October 23 to discuss marijuana and public health, featuring panels that include witnesses from federal agencies and academia. The Caucus is co-chaired by Senators John Cornyn (R-TX) and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA). Senator Cornyn is an outspoken opponent of cannabis legalization, stating recently that he wants to hold this hearing in advance of any vote on SAFE Banking. Surgeon General Jerome Adams, who has been an outspoken critic of marijuana reform, is scheduled to testify. Also testifying will be Nora Volkow, Director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Volkow has opined that the Schedule I status of marijuana under the Controlled Substances Act is inhibiting research. This is consistent with NCIA’s position, which is that we need to de-schedule, regulate, and test. 
  • CDC Principal Deputy Director Anne Schuchat emphasized last week that the majority of vaping-related injuries associated with THC-containing cartridges are being traced back to the illicit market, rather than state-legal cannabis shops. 
  • Former Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Scott Gottlieb said last week that cannabis should be de-scheduled and that the federal government should regulate marijuana. 
  • California lawmakers are considering an outright ban of all vape products, including nicotine and THC. This potential action comes on the heels of Charlie Baker, Governor of Massachusetts, banning all vaping products for four months. 
  • Anti-marijuana legalization group Project SAM (Smart Approaches to Marijuana) hired three new lobbyists to help fight SAFE banking and other cannabis legislation on Capitol Hill and sent a letter this week from the organization’s science advisory board to congressional leadership urging them not to support cannabis legislation. 
  • As of October 15, 2019, 1,479 lung injury cases associated with the use of vaping products have been reported to CDC from 49 states (all except Alaska), the District of Columbia, and 1 U.S. territory. Thirty-three deaths have been confirmed in 24 states. The CDC is updating this information every Thursday. 

 

Download NCIA’s Policy Council report: Adapting A Regulatory Framework For The Emerging Cannabis Industry

 

Former FDA Commissioner Calls For Descheduling And Federal Regulation

by Andrew Kline, NCIA’s Director of Public Policy

With uncertainty about the proximate cause of the vaping crisis continuing to roil state regulators, and state governors trying to determine the right short-term solution to protect the public health, the former Commissioner of the FDA has a longer-term plan. Former Commissioner Scott Gottlieb is rightly calling for descheduling and federal regulation in an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal. NCIA made the same argument in our Policy Council’s recent white paper on regulating cannabis post-legalization and in our public responses to the vaping crisis. 

While no one yet knows for certain what has been causing these injuries and deaths, it is readily apparent that unregulated and untested products are extremely dangerous and continue to infiltrate the market. Just last week, a mother and her two sons were arrested for allegedly illegally filling over 30,000 vape cartridges in Wisconsin from their home. That burgeoning illicit and untested market poses real risks to American consumers. And the best way to eliminate the illicit market is to create opportunities for consumers to purchase products from legal dispensaries and market awareness of the benefits of purchasing from those regulated markets. 

For example, if consumers know that legal dispensaries are selling regulated products that have been tested to improve consumer safety, then they will be more inclined to stop purchasing from the illicit market. People already know that when they step foot into a grocery store, the foods they eat and the drugs and dietary supplements they take are part of a supply chain designed to improve safety. That is because they have placed trust in the USDA and FDA. And no better way to build consumer confidence, than to make sure that trusted federal agencies are in charge of promoting public health in the cannabis industry. 

We can’t continue to leave the cannabis industry in a state of uncertainty. It’s time to deschedule, regulate at the federal level, and require mandatory lab testing. We must displace the illegal, unregulated and untested illicit market. There is no plan B. 

Andrew Kline is Director of Public Policy for NCIA and Chair of NCIA’s Safe Vaping Task Force 

What The Cannabis Industry – And Congress – Can Do To Help The Vaping Illness Outbreak

by Morgan Fox, NCIA Director of Media Relations

In recent weeks, the reports of mysterious respiratory illnesses tied largely to unregulated cannabis vaping products, as well as some other products including nicotine vapes, have turned from a trickle into a steady flow. The most recent count is at over 1000 cases, including more than a dozen deaths. One of the most troubling aspects of this outbreak is that it is still unknown what exactly is causing these illnesses. Early research seems to be pointing to additives or thickening agents as the most likely culprit, but other causes are being explored such as the presence of pesticides and fungicides that create dangerous byproducts, faulty delivery devices, problematic consumption patterns, and pre-existing medical conditions. 

One thread seems to tie all these cases together: almost all of them involved untested products that were produced and purchased on the illicit market.

At its roots, however, is the same thing that has caused most of the other problems associated with cannabis: prohibition.

Outdated federal policies are responsible for the existence of the underground market for this popular substance in the first place. Their dominance over this medically beneficial plant for nearly a century continues to block research, discourages states from regulating cannabis and making it legal for adults, prevents the federal government from establishing uniform safety standards or providing guidance to states that are implementing sensible policies, and make it harder for legal businesses to displace illicit operators around the country. This is in addition to the suffering and harm caused by the criminal enforcement of these policies, which disproportionately impacts low-income communities and people of color.

Unfortunately, some governmental agencies are glossing over these facts. Last month, Massachusetts instituted a four-month ban on all vaping products, and on Friday the Food and Drug Administration issued a warning urging people to stop consuming any vape products containing THC, despite THC itself and legal products generally not being implicated in these cases. Other states and localities are considering total bans as well.

The cannabis industry is deeply troubled by this outbreak, but we are also concerned that reactionary responses to it at the state and federal levels could make the problem even worse. Preventing the sale altogether of regulated and quality-controlled cannabis products could easily drive more consumers to purchase potentially dangerous products from the illicit market. The lack of competition from legal, licensed producers and retailers could also embolden irresponsible underground operators to drastically increase production in order to meet demand, as well as cut corners even further and make their products even more unsafe. Such reactions are a common response to tragedies like this, but they often cause more harm than good in the long run.

Rather, states should be reviewing their regulations regarding testing and labeling and should be in close contact with federal and state medical authorities so that they can incorporate the latest information into their regulatory response. Producers should also be reexamining their methods and avoiding the use of any additives that have so far been linked to these cases.

At the federal level, the best way to help fix this issue, as well as prevent further outbreaks from happening at all, is to end prohibition.

On October 3rd, NCIA delivered a letter to every member of Congress signed by more nearly 800 business leaders, advocates, and policy experts, which urges them to immediately work to remove cannabis from the Controlled Substances Act and work to regulate the substance at the federal level. This letter references a paper produced by NCIA’s Policy Council released on October 1 that suggests a regulatory framework for various cannabis products through existing federal agencies, most notably the FDA and the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB).

The letter closes with: “It is clear that the American public wants quality-controlled cannabis products made available for adults and patients. The recent news is, unfortunately, yet another reminder that there is no time to waste. Our industry wants to provide the products voters demand with a tireless focus on improving consumer safety. While state regulators and licensed businesses appear to be doing an excellent job at keeping potentially dangerous products out of the legal market, federal descheduling and regulation will allow more research and help states continue to improve their regulatory activities and oversight, as well as provide universal standards for safety. We are ready to work collaboratively with federal lawmakers, the same way we have at the state level for over a decade. Please let us know how we can help move the ball forward on descheduling legislation. Lives are literally at stake.”

That pretty much says it all. It is up to members of the legal cannabis industry to continue to prioritize consumer safety and do everything in their power to make sure they are going above and beyond state regulatory requirements in this area. But it is ultimately up to Congress to end prohibition, regulate cannabis intelligently, and help us replace the illicit market to the greatest extent possible. With your support, we can continue to work with lawmakers every day to help make this a reality.

 

 

Video: Member Spotlight – WonderLeaf

In this month’s video member spotlight, we headed to Aurora, Colorado, to visit with the family-owned team at the WonderLeaf facility, founded in 2015. WonderLeaf products feature full-spectrum cannabinoids and strain-specific extractions. Learn more about WonderLeaf’s values of educating the consumer through budtender education tools, including information about the terpenes and cannabinoid profiles of their products.

Member Blog: Helping Mary Jane Is Good For Business

by Kharla Vezzetti, Business Membership and Advertising Manager at California NORML

Who is the cannabis consumer to you?

In a vast industry with so many important contributors, the one group that we all have in common and eventually serve is the consumer. The cannabis consumer is our shared financial bottom line, the foundation of our industry, our end-all reason for being in business. The cannabis consumer is one huge group. While your company may see your target market as including a specific demographic, the totality of the cannabis consumer group spans ages, genders, and socio-economic groups more so than the average marketed “widget.” That said, there are needs and concerns that the average cannabis consumers share. 

I Call Her Mary Jane. 

While we all move forward in California ‘s post Prop 64 environment, our ongoing goals, as both businesses and organizations, need to be consumer-focused. Mary Jane’s needs, as an individual, must not be overlooked. 

Mary needs to be healthy and free enough to drive herself to work. She needs to not fear being honest with her doctor, nor be submitted to a job-ending drug test. She needs to be able to afford and have access to her choice of medicine. She needs advocates and educators to monitor our legislators, answer her questions, and to fight for her rights as a cannabis consumer. She needs all of us to honor her importance as the foundation she is. 

Why You Should Support Mary Jane’s Rights:

An Employed Consumer Base Is Essential For Product Sales. 

Think about how you would attempt to sell cannabis to the unemployed. California, unlike 15 other states, still subjects employees to the risk of losing their jobs or being denied employment due to their cannabis usage, even when Mary has a doctor’s recommendation. Read more about the solution here. 

Consumers Must Be Free To Discuss Cannabis With Their Doctors Without Repercussions.

Medical Cannabis users are a large portion of the industry’s market. Unfortunately, California pain patients, who wish to reduce their use of opioids with cannabis, currently risk losing their prescription medication if they get caught supplementing with cannabis. Read more about this discriminatory issue here.

Californians Love Driving—Many Must Drive.

Year after year, unscientific and discriminatory driving laws are proposed by state legislators. Just imagine Mary losing her license due to simply having THC in her bloodstream. She is now unable to get to work or to her doctor’s visits. Good thing for Mary, this scenario is being regularly averted by California NORML, while cannabis delivery rights have also been maintained across the state.

Contributing To Mary’s Rights Is Good For Your Branding. 

Showing yourself as a company that cares about the consumer, their health, happiness and well-being, as well as exhibiting respect for their history, sets you apart in a California cannabis community which has such old, strong roots alongside so many new players.

Sane Laws And Regulations Benefit All.

In this fast-growing and adapting climate, we must have a say on proposed laws and regulations that affect our industry and those who depend on our success. Read more about Cal NORML’s recent accomplishments and current plans on behalf of Californians here.

It’s often said that California “leads the way” for the rest of the United States. While this hasn’t always been true, a state our size with a cannabis history so long and distinguished should continue to strive to be a positive trendsetter. Let’s keep Mary Jane at the forefront of our plans for success. She is more than an email analytic or a dollar sign. Mary and her needs spurned this modern movement with the passage of Prop 215. She should continue to be the inspiration, and a significant focus for the industry. When we take care of Mary, as our combined consumer, we all win. 


Kharla Vezzetti volunteered in the 1990s as a both a signature gatherer as well as the Media Liaison for the Sonoma County chapter of Californian’s for Compassionate Use, working on what was to become Prop 215/The Compassionate Use Act of 1996, the first successful medical marijuana initiative in the country.

From 1996-1998, Vezzetti was the owner and operator of Natural Harvest, a wholesale distribution and retail vending business specializing in Sonoma County produced industrial hemp products. 

In the years 1997-1999, She was the Advertising Manager for HempWorld: The International Hemp Journal and Hemp Pages: The Hemp Industry Source Book, both first of their kind publications.

In 1998, Vezzetti served as a member on the Board of Advisers for the Industrial Use of Hemp (Marijuana) Initiative 

She excitedly joined the staff of California NORML in 2017, where she continues as the non-profit organization’s Business Membership and Advertising Manager. Additionally, she is a graphic designer, marketing advisor, and blogger based in Santa Rosa, Sonoma County, CA. 

 

 

Webinar: SAFE Banking – What’s Next?

Join this webinar on September 30 at 1:00 PM MT to learn more about cannabis policy and legislative priorities for the 116th Congress. You’ll get the latest updates on the SAFE Banking Act and other cannabis legislation being considered in this Congress. You’ll also get an update on NCIA’s plan for how cannabis should be regulated by the federal government post-legalization. Lastly, you’ll learn more about how NCIA’s plan to federally regulate can help to solve issues around vaping.

 

REGISTER NOW

Member Blog: Cannabis Seed To Sale Transparency Provides Solution To Vaping Illnesses

by Jessica Billingsley, CEO of Akerna
NCIA Board Member

The day I sat beside the MRI while my daughter’s mystery neurologic symptoms were investigated, I began my crusade for product transparency. I didn’t know then that transparency in products would become life’s work. On that day, I only knew my daughter risked potential long term physical and mental disability due to unknown causes. I then spent months, which turned into years, hunting for a solution to her neurologic events, which started with an unexplained fever that would sometimes develop into lesions in her brain causing varying symptoms depending on the location of the lesions. Often the symptom manifested as trouble walking; however, one heartbreaking time, she slurred her words and couldn’t remember many basic components of speech. 

She was diagnosed with recurrent ADEM, an autoimmune demyelinating illness that doctors didn’t understand and were at a loss to cure. The western medicine approach didn’t have an answer, and I wasn’t really surprised. Western medicine’s approach of diagnose and drug (or diagnose, surgery, and drug) rarely takes into account what we put in and on our bodies. And my gut told me I needed to take a closer look at foods and products to find the source of her illness. This is a lot easier than it sounds. We actually know very little about what’s in our products. There’s an assumption that harmful ingredients or additives have to be disclosed in products, but they don’t. My journey into product transparency — looking at ingredients, additives, and the chemicals used to make our products — led me to find a solution for my daughter that has resulted in her being 7 years in remission and counting.

My passion for saving my daughter and my tenacity in peeling back the layers in our consumer product goods supply chain left me with a sobering conclusion: Consumer transparency and public safety is not at the forefront of our current consumer goods regulations. We don’t have any requirements to give consumers transparency regarding what’s fully in the products we eat or absorb. That perspective is what inspired me to launch the first seed-to-sale tracking technology in 2010. I believed then that cannabis patients needed to know how their medicine was grown and the public needed assurances that we can identify the regulated, tested medicine from the illicit alternatives.

The number of vaping-related illnesses keeps climbing. The crisis has claimed at least six deaths and there are over 450 cases in 36 states and the U.S. Virgin Islands. And best, early thinking is additives – cutting agents, potentially Vitamin E – may be the culprit. I am reminded clearly of my daughter’s early years and my hunt for product transparency. We’ve done a lot of good with seed-to-sale tracking in cannabis. The regulated cannabis industry has the most transparent and accountable supply chain of any consumer packaged good. 

For nearly ten years, my team has refined a technology that pinpoints most every aspect of every gram of cannabis tracked in our system — the plot of land it was grown on, soil nutrients, water and light intake, additional ingredients for edibles, when it shipped out and in what batch, and finally where and when the product was sold and to what patient. The exactness and granularity of this data enables prompt reactions in times of crisis that narrows down areas/people of impact, points investigators to probable causes, and importantly allows consumers and patients to make informed decisions. 

As much as we do track in regulated cannabis, we need to track more. Most governmental compliance frameworks don’t require additives to be tracked and thus communicated to consumers and patients. We need to make this mandatory in our regulations.*

Consumers and the industry should rally around three things. First, the majority of the cartridges in this crisis were purchased on the illicit market with completely unknown ingredient sources, which gives more reason to legalize cannabis in every state for adult use. Second, legal markets should continue to implement seed to sale tracking compliance as table stakes. And third, we need to make additives information a requirement for cannabis oil manufactured products.

I knew the industry needed a means of monitoring products through its lifecycle and generating transparency and accountability to support the 3P’s — patient, product, and public safety. I know the data in our system has the power to do great good — for science and medicine, for food and agriculture, for communities and tax revenues, for governments’ ability to respond to issues and effectively direct investigations and enforcements. I contend that while the industry is part of the health crisis story today — we are part of the response tomorrow. I am as committed today as CEO of Akerna as I was when I started MJ Freeway; we can give consumers the full product transparency they deserve to make the best choices for their health. It’s what I want for my daughter, and it’s the solution I commit to deliver every day. 


Jessica Billingsley is a technology pioneer, solutions creator and industry leader, providing proven compliance software solutions to the cannabis market. She is the Chief Executive Officer of Akerna—the first cannabis compliance technology company to be traded on Nasdaq—making her the first CEO from this market space to bring a company to a major U.S. exchange. Jessica is also the CEO of Akerna’s flagship subsidiary—MJ Freeway. She established MJ Freeway in 2010 and it is the leading seed-to-sale regulatory compliance technology provider and developer of the cannabis industry’s first enterprise resource planning (ERP) platform. Akerna also offers Leaf Data Systems as a government resource for public sector compliance. Combined entities tracked more than $16 billion in world-wide, client cannabis sales to date. She is the first woman ever from the cannabis industry to receive the prestigious Fortune’s “Most Promising Women Entrepreneur Award” and is also recognized as one of Inc.’s “Female Founders 100.” Jessica received a degree in Communications and Computer Science from the University of Georgia and lives with her daughter in Denver.

 

Akerna’s MJ Platform includes “additives” as ingredients clients can use to communicate to patients any additives in a finished gram of oil. We believe additive ingredients should now be a required data field captured and communicated to patients, and we’re committed to training our existing client base on how to do so. 

Member Blog: Who is the Canna-Consumer? 

By Anthony Bratti, West Region President, LOCALiQ

The cannabis industry today is characterized by rapid growth and a degree of unpredictability as it faces issues including legality, stigma, and all the challenges that come with offering a product never before mass-retailed.

Dispensaries and other key market players have long been operating in the dark when it comes to their customers. With little data around the attributes and lifestyles of their target consumer, the new industry has a long way to go when considering marketing opportunities.  

In order to shed light on the best marketing practices for this burgeoning industry, we surveyed over 8,000 consumers between the ages of 21 and 64, in the 21 states where cannabis is currently legal to create LOCALiQ’s Canna Curious Report. The report reveals the lifestyle attributes, shopping behaviors, consumption motivators and brand selection drivers for the industry’s top customer segments. The surveyed individuals were split into two groups, current consumers and acceptors.

Here are the key segments of consumers that industry companies should pay particular attention to impress: 

Affluent Families with Children

We found that affluent families with children under the age of 18 were an active cannabis consumption group. Spending over $623 million on cannabis-related products, this group has the potential to grow to a market worth over $1 billion.

In this segment, dads were typically the more active purchasers, shopping at more than 4 dispensaries in the past 3 months, while moms tended to be more brand loyal and shop at the same dispensary. 

The data supports that to impress this segment, dispensaries should focus on offering a wide variety of products, as well as prioritizing price and convenience. 

Baby Boomers

Baby boomers were another top consumption group, with the majority of those surveyed going to a dispensary monthly, and 60 percent of non-consuming boomers more likely to consider it than millennials.

To reach this customer segment, companies will likely have the most success maintaining strong websites, advertising in newspapers, and creating online videos as these are top discovery sources for the baby boomer group. 

The top motivator for usage in this group is strongly tied to health and pain management, with 58 percent of baby boomer respondents displaying a preference for alternative medicine. 

Frequent Shoppers

The frequent shopper group is more diverse in demographics than our previous two categories, but has the most focused purchasing pattern, with most shopping at a dispensary 3-4 times per month. The frequent shopper group boasts the highest spending but tends to be the least loyal, easily swayed to competitors due to price, product variety and staff friendliness. 

Promotions are more likely to be impactful with this segment, as 62 percent indicated receiving notifications of promotions through news sites and email or text message. 

Acceptors

Defined as current non-users who are open to cannabis consumption in legal states, this group spans many demographics. These cannabis curious consumers cited reasonable prices, a good selection of products/strains, and friendly and helpful staff as their top brand selection drivers. 

As dispensaries become more established in cannabis-legal states and competition intensifies, it’ll be more important than ever for sellers to understand their consumer, whose preferences vary widely by segment. For example, while a frequent millennial buyer may be well-targeted through personalized text message or email promotions, a baby boomer is much more likely to consult their local news for a trusted recommendation. 

To grow alongside the quickly expanding industry, cannabis businesses should work to prioritize legal, digital marketing, storytelling, and target marketing expertise, to continue to attract and retain customers. 


Anthony Bratti is the Regional President – West for the USA TODAY NETWORK/LOCALiQ. In this role, Anthony leads and supports the west coast sales teams as they drive digital advertising and strengthen relationships with local businesses. Anthony’s success as a leader and executive is rooted in nearly 20 years of global business experience ranging from early-stage start-ups to mid-level enterprises and Fortune 50 companies, as well as local community involvement. He is actively involved in the greater Phoenix economic development group and Phoenix Chamber of Commerce.

Prior to joining the USA TODAY NETWORK, Anthony enjoyed a long, global career at AT&T where he served both domestic and international markets, served as the SVP of Business Development at Buzzboard, and most recently, as the Head of Channel Sales at ReachLocal. His vast experience, deep knowledge of digital media, and innovative thinking make Anthony one of the most transformational sales and marketing leaders within the USA TODAY NETWORK.

The Burning Question – When Will SAFE Banking Get A Vote?

by Michelle Rutter, NCIA Government Relations Manager

With Congress returning from their annual August recess, all I seem to be asked is “when will we get a vote on SAFE Banking?” And while it’s unclear whether that vote will be in September or beyond, it’s important to remember that this is the farthest a standalone, pro-cannabis bill has ever gotten in the U.S. House of Representatives. Since the House Financial Services Committee hearing on this topic earlier this year, it seems like the momentum to pass this legislation has only increased. Let’s take a look back and what’s happened and what’s to come:

First, in February, the Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Financial Institutions held its first-ever hearing on marijuana and financial services, entitled: Challenges and Solutions: Access to Banking Services for Cannabis-Related Businesses. Up for discussion at the time was a draft of the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act. Later, in March, HR 1595/S. 1200: the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act was introduced in the House of Representatives by Reps. Ed Perlmutter (D-CO) and Denny Heck (D-WA) and in the Senate by Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and Cory Gardner (R-CO). In a stunning, historic surprise, the legislation was introduced with a whopping 106 original cosponsors in the House. By July, that number rose to include more than 205 cosponsors.

As a refresher, the SAFE Banking Act would prevent federal banking regulators from punishing banks for working with cannabis-related businesses that are obeying state laws or halting their services, taking action on loans made to those businesses, or limiting a depository institution’s access to the Deposit Insurance Fund. The bill would also protect ancillary businesses that work with the cannabis industry from being charged with money laundering and other financial crimes, and requires the Financial Institution Examination Council to develop guidance to help credit unions and banks understand how to lawfully serve cannabis businesses.

After the bill was introduced, the House Financial Services decided to take the next step in the legislative process and schedule a mark-up of the bill. A markup is the process by which a congressional committee debates, amends, and rewrites proposed legislation. 

The bill is read for amendment, one section at a time, with committee members offering their amendments to each section after it is read but before the next section is read. Committees do not change the texts of the bills they mark up. Instead, committees vote on amendments that their members want to recommend that the House adopts when the House considers the bill on the floor. The bill passed out of committee with flying colors — by a margin of 45-15. 

In May, we got another signal that the SAFE Banking Act is being taken very seriously on Capitol Hill- the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released a cost estimate, or “score” of the legislation. The report stated, “CBO estimates H.R. 1595 would decrease net direct spending by $4 million over the 2019-2029 period.” 

Then, in July, we couldn’t believe our eyes and ears when it was announced that longtime cannabis opponent and Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID) planned to hold a hearing entitled, “Challenges for Cannabis and Banking: Outside Perspectives,” to discuss the current banking challenges faced by the legal cannabis industry and to assess the unintended consequences and public safety risks associated with commercial businesses operating in an all-cash environment. 

Chairman Crapo dedicated much of his time to understand how the SAFE Banking Act would regulate financial institutions and ensure the banking industry could and operate in compliance with a business selling a Schedule I product. Towards the end of the hearing, Crapo said, “I think the case has been made pretty strongly here today about the need to get the banking industry issues relating to cannabis resolved.

This week, Congress returns to Washington, and we at NCIA are preparing for a House Floor vote on SAFE in the next one to two months. In the meantime, we need you to call your Representative and Senators and ask them to ask leadership to hold a vote on HR 1595/S. 1200, the SAFE Banking Act! You can find tips and talking points here.

Member Blog: Hemp And CBD Consumer Insights – Who, Why, And How

By Stephen J. Gongaware, Sr. Vice President of Business Development at Management Science Associates, Inc. (MSA)

Hemp CBD became the fastest growing CPG product in 2019, following its legalization in the Farm Bill of December 2018. Consumers show great interest in its use for wellness, health & beauty applications and for pets. Its many distribution channels require integrating convenience store and shipment data not required for most dispensary products.

In U.S. Convenience Stores, total sales of CBD have increased 168% in the first half of 2019 while average weekly dollar sales increased by 235%. 

The higher revenue growth accompanied CBD content per package increasing from 100mg on January 5, 2019 steadily to over 350mg on July 20, 2019, after having peaked briefly in June 2019 near 450mg per unit. See graph below.

Mg CBD per SKU at Retail

Medical Conditions Treated with Cannabis

Pain relief is the major reason cited as a medical condition for cannabis use, followed by nausea, PTSD, muscle spasms, IBD and opioid addiction as seen in the following table:

Source: Consumer Research Around Cannabis

 

Cannabis and Opioid Use Disorder

Of particular note is the growing number of consumers using Cannabis to treat Opioid Use Disorder (OUD). As of August 2019, seven states have approved medical cannabis for treating OUD: PA, NY, NJ, NM, MO, IL & CO. Twenty-one studies (2009-19) show the effect of cannabis on helping opioid users to reduce or eliminate the use of opioids to treat pain. NFL professional athletes have withdrawn from using opioids after they retire, with the aid of CBD and/or adult cannabis.

Consumer Purchase Drivers of OTC Hemp CBD

The top consumer drivers of OTC Hemp CBD are pain relief, reducing anxiety and helping sleep, as shown in the following graph.

Cannabis Product Composition and Patient Outcomes

Over the past several years, advances in technology have greatly enhanced the prospects for cannabis growers, processors, and dispensaries to provide medical cannabis products to patients that efficaciously treat the medical conditions and alleviate the incapacitating symptoms that they suffer. 

Pre-clinical scientific research is determining the physiological effects of individual cannabinoids and terpenes on specific medical conditions and symptoms. Mobile apps are enabling the systematic querying of patients about the efficacy of specific cannabis strains and products in alleviating symptoms and conditions. 

Collectively, these advances and other medical research are creating volumes of evidence to which human and artificial intelligence will be applied to develop insights for use by patients and medical researchers, growers, and processors in formulating products creating newer therapeutic options. Patients are already making informed decisions that improve individualized treatment of medical conditions progressively over time due to CBD being an approved over-the-counter consumer product. 

Advanced Consumer and Patient Targeting to Improve Marketing and Medical Outcomes

Consumer attitudes, perceptions, and usage in local markets create richer, more actionable insights from customer segments, creating advanced quality scores and indices for scoring first-party internal data.

Cannabis consumer data is used for strategic and tactical product development, applications including:

  • Market Architecture: differentiating dimensions of product form and brand choice
  • Key Reasons for Use and Purchase
  • Affinity with Media, Channel, and other Product Categories

Multiple correspondence analysis of hundreds of consumer survey category questions is used to understand dimensional distinctions and differences between clusters. These key spatial dimensions for segmentation illuminate key differentiators, for use in innovation/new products, brand strategy, marketing execution, and digital media tactics.

Create Target Profiles

Merging cannabis consumer data with general consumer data such as Financial, Healthcare, Restaurants, Grocery/Drug Stores, and Media usage & exposure for each respondent facilitates creation of new consumer segments.

Using zip code identified respondent level data, the above Target Profile clusters can be integrated with other market and first–party data to prioritize personalization, enhance brand positioning, inform messaging, new customer marketing & acquisition efforts, and multi-touch attribution databases.


Mr. Stephen J. Gongaware is Sr. Vice President of Business Development at MSA (Management Science Associates, Inc.), a privately held diverse information technology development and service firm that for over 50 years has provided innovative solutions within its three core competencies of analysis, technology and data management. He has played a major role in developing and managing several MSA businesses in addition to his focus since 2014 on the medical value of cannabis for prospective patients, beginning with CBD and 20 other nonpsychedelic cannabinoids then measured by leading edge test labs. Other businesses he’s created and managed at MSA in the last 20 years includes services to develop/market pharma “rare disease” solutions, and MSA Casino Gaming solutions improving operation of slot floors, player satisfaction and also lead smart phone and sports book innovative projects with 6 of the Top 10 global casino operators and with several major gaming equipment manufacturers.

Prior to joining MSA, Mr. Gongaware was CEO of NetworkNext, an innovative national advertising firm; R&D Director at Cellomics, Inc. where he was awarded US Patent #US6365367; and an Electrical  Engineer at Westinghouse Electric Corp.  He received his BSEE degree from University of Pittsburgh in 1992 and his MBA from its Katz School of Business in 1995.

MSA is an Analytics firm with Big Data integration capability incorporated in 1963 to focus on improving government and management decisions. MSA has 800+ professionals with expertise in data science & AI, software development, test marketing, data management and management consulting and many of its innovations have become industry-standard solutions. MSA has served over 70 Fortune 500 Customers/Clients in the CPG, Media, Metals, Life Sciences & Pharma, and Casino Gaming & Sports Betting industries. It has been engaged in cannabis research since 2013 with the goal of providing the cannabis industry similar services to what has been now provided to the CPG, Steel, Tobacco, Casino Gaming, and Pharma industries for more than 50 years.

Post-Recess Predictions: Looking Into The Crystal Ball

by Andrew Kline, NCIA’s Director of Public Policy

Kids are back in school. The weather is starting to cool off. Congress’s August recess has come to a close. And it’s time to get back to the business of marijuana reform. 

As 2019 starts to wind down and we gear up for 2020, it’s a great time to reflect on what we’ve accomplished, what challenges lie ahead, and what we think we can accomplish in the coming months.

Will we see Congressional action on myriad marijuana bills pending before Congress? Will we see new marijuana-related bills being introduced? Will Senate Republicans allow a floor vote on any marijuana-related legislation? Will House Democrats reach a consensus on marijuana-related priorities? Will the Presidential candidates reach consensus on the right approach for marijuana? The answer to all of these questions is… maybe. And the reason is not just that Republicans have been historically opposed to marijuana-related legislation. It’s because there is no consensus on the right approach. No consensus on a policy issue in Congress? Shocking, huh? 

We’re starting to see this divide in Congress, with Democrats sponsoring legislation that de-schedules marijuana and Republicans supporting more incremental approaches like SAFE Banking and the STATES Act. Who will win the battle of the ages? It’s anyone’s guess. And while NCIA supports incremental approaches, they are plainly suboptimal. Below, I lay out two scenarios that are simultaneously at play. But first, let’s take a step back. 

There’s no industry with a more impressive growth rate – and more potential than cannabis. Period. Whether you’re talking THC, CBD, CBN, or CBG, it’s all the rage. Recently, analysts called for $200 billion in yearly sales within a decade. And Congress should care about this issue because of the economics alone. But – and this is a big but, in order for the industry to reach those economic goals, or anything close to it, one thing must happen: The United States has to legalize all forms of cannabis at the federal level. And by federal legalization, I mean de-scheduling. And for those of you less familiar with Washington speak, “de-scheduling” means:

  • Removing cannabis from the authority of the DEA
  • Removing cannabis from a list of illegal drugs that have no medicinal benefits like heroin, LSD, and meth
  • Legalizing cannabis at the federal level so that there is no conflict with state laws
  • Legalizing cannabis at the federal level so that banks no longer a risk of federal money laundering charges by doing business with the industry
  • Legalizing cannabis at the federal level so that the federal tax code permits businesses to take small business deductions
  • And providing FDA and the Department of Treasury with regulatory authority like they do with alcohol, tobacco, prescriptions drugs, dietary supplements, and foods

There is no other long-term viable option for the cannabis community. 

My role at the National Cannabis Industry Association (NCIA) is to lead public policy development for the industry. We’re working hard – on and off Capitol Hill – on comprehensive reforms that begin with de-scheduling. And if you’re committed to the growth of the industry, then you should join us. The Policy Council that I lead needs cannabis professionals to help us develop policies that support the best possible climate for entrepreneurs. If you care about being able to materialize the financial opportunity here, then you should care about creating the public policy climate that will allow the industry to really flourish. 

Make no mistake about it: We’ve come an incredibly long way in the U.S. since the mid-90s when no state had legalized medical or adult-use marijuana, and support for legalization stood at roughly 25%. Today, two-thirds of respondents to Gallup’s annual poll favor legalizing recreational marijuana, with about 90% in support of medicinal cannabis. 33 states have approved medical cannabis in some capacity. Of these 33 states, a third (11) also allow adult-use consumption. 

So, where is the federal government on this? Here are two possible scenarios.

Scenario One is that Congress passes some sort of incremental legislation in the near term. 

There is a lot of cannabis-related activity going on in Washington D.C. these days. And there is good reason to believe that Congress will pass some form of cannabis legislation in the 116th Congress. But, if that happens, it’s likely to be an incremental approach – like SAFE Banking or the STATES Act – which provide protection for state-legal cannabis businesses from federal encroachment.

There was a hearing in the Senate Banking Committee on SAFE banking last month. Yes, you heard that right. There was a full committee hearing, chaired by a conservative Republican from Idaho. And Republican Senator Corey Gardner from Colorado testified in support of SAFE banking legislation. Senator Gardner is also a champion of the STATES Act, another incremental approach. This is an amazing feat, but does it mean that republican leadership has seen the light on cannabis? Maybe. 

Or, maybe they just know the Presidential election will be decided by slim margins and the republicans can’t cede the marijuana issue to the democrats. Banking would be an easy win. And they wouldn’t have to support full federal legalization to support banking. 

We also know that the House is poised to pass something soon. They have 206 co-sponsors for SAFE Banking. An impressive number. Word on the street is that that bill could move as quickly as this month in the House.

And think about this. Dozens of Attorneys General recently sued big pharma for knowingly selling opioids that are highly addictive and actually killing thousands of people annually. At the same time, three dozen Attorneys General sent a letter to Congress, asking that they pass the SAFE Banking Act for cannabis. Quite amazing. 

Where there’s smoke, there’s fire, right? With all of this legislative activity, a bill must be coming to the floor, right? Maybe. 

Mitch McConnell is not a cannabis fan, and he controls the legislative calendar in the Senate. But, hemp is a huge industry in Kentucky and NCIA has worked to have protections for hemp and CBD added to the SAFE Banking Act, so Mitch McConnell may now care more than he did just a month ago. 

So, I do think that it’s likely that we will see some kind of legislative compromise on incremental reform soon. And all signs appear to point to SAFE banking. 

But, it’s unlikely that any such compromise will include de-scheduling. 

And unless cannabis is made federally legal through de-scheduling, banks still risk federal money laundering charges by doing business with the industry, the federal tax code would still prohibit cannabis businesses from taking small business deductions, and possession of cannabis would still be federally illegal, setting people up for continued arrests for federal crimes that are state-legal in 33 states across the country. The economic impact of anything short of de-scheduling will continue to cripple any real small business growth. 

So, while I actually think that we may see some legislative action in the coming weeks, it will likely not be the “end all be all” that some of us have been working toward. And it might not be enough to pacify investors or key constituencies. 

But, it’s also possible that even small marijuana reform might not happen anytime soon. 

So, here is scenario two: We don’t see any real movement in the coming weeks, notwithstanding some positive signs, for a handful of reasons:

  • Republicans generally aren’t fans of cannabis. Republicans have historically had a more negative view of cannabis than Democrats or Independents. In Gallup’s October 2018 poll, 75% of Democrats and 71% of Independents favored broad-based legalization, which compares to “just” 53% of Republicans – the party that controls the White House and Senate. And Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, no friend to the industry, controls all of the cards in the Senate.
  • CBD regulations are stuck in a bureaucratic morass at FDA. Lawmakers are also taking their cues from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which has been contemplating how to regulate CBD for months. THC regulation will be harder. Much harder. And once Congress de-schedules, the FDA and Department of Treasury need to be ready to regulate. That is not tomorrow. Or next week. Or next month.
  • The U.S. Treasury is raking it in. Because cannabis businesses can’t take normal business deductions because of arcane tax rules, companies are paying an effective tax rate of more than 80%. So, the IRS is collecting massive taxes from businesses that are federally illegal. Once cannabis becomes federally legal, businesses can take normal deductions and pay less than half of the current tax rate. This would cost the U.S. treasury billions.

So, it’s possible that Congress does nothing in the short term.

No matter what, NCIA will continue to fight, on and off the Hill, for comprehensive reforms. And while we would be happy in the short term with some incremental relief, only de-scheduling solves myriad problems facing this burgeoning industry. It’s time for Congress to act. And there is no time like the present to get the ball rolling. NCIA will soon be releasing a white paper on how we believe that marijuana should be regulated at the federal level. And that plan starts with de-scheduling. We hope that Congressional leaders will take note. 

VIDEO: Member Spotlight – Om Of Medicine

In this month’s video member spotlight, get to know Om of Medicine, a cannabis dispensary based in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Learn about their role in fostering a politically engaged and friendly community in their state of the art facility. Om of Medicine also collaborated with the University of Michigan conducting an IRB-approved pain study with hundreds of its patients which displayed a significant decrease in opioid use and an increase in quality of life.

 

Member Blog: Borrowing for Cannabis – What You Need to Know 

by Cheryl Dearborne, Director of Marketing and Financial Services at Lilogy

Now that cannabis is legal either medically or recreationally in 33 states, and hemp/CBD is federally legal, the cannabis industry is operating with high profit margins, and in order to scale and grow, cannabis companies require capital and financial services on par with any industry. However, the fight between cannabis progressive state laws and regressive federal laws lend to an unstable financial market for these budding companies.

Tax code 280E is a prime example of how cannabis merchants are playing on an uneven field. This tax code disallows cannabis companies to write-off business expenditures because cannabis (THC) is still considered a Schedule I controlled substance, thus creating smaller profit margins. The upside to that kind of disability from an investor’s point of view is that companies netting positively look particularly strong as they are doing so without the same financial privileges as most companies looking for capital. The same can be said for companies that are barely in the black, as they also are staying in operation sans privileges. 

However, due to regulations like 280E and the uncertainty behind the federal government’s stance on cannabis, access to capital can seem impossible. Let’s look at some educational tools to help you obtain access to that capital if and when you need it.

Start-up with a solid team

The cannabis industry today can feel over-saturated because business resources are scarce, leaving millions of interesting companies in the lurch for lack of funding. Therefore, start-ups can feel far removed from the ability to access capital. As we mentioned earlier, capital is necessary to scale and grow, and once potential funding is sourced, there are a few measures that can be taken to place your company as a top priority for funding. 

One such measure is building a solid team with industry (or position-relative) experience that proves your company has the ability to scale with the collective experience and success records of the executives attached. If any of your owners have a profitable company, it is always a possibility to use that company to guarantee your loan. We will address this further in the assets/collateral section below. 

Have clear financial needs and a plan for profit

The companies most qualifying for financing have projected income and a clear plan for obtaining those financial goals for at least 2-3 years out from the current business year. What would be most advantageous is if you can show how the money you borrow would work into your projected financing. 

For instance: Let’s say you want to borrow $1MM to purchase enough land to plant and harvest hemp and produce up to 30,000 lbs of biomass. Once on the market, you can project that you would make $1.5-2MM the following year once you put your product on the market (isolates, distillates etc). 

The golden facts about this deal are that the borrower in question presumably has seeds, an equipped lab to produce the biomass, etc. and relationships/contracts with distributors that plan to purchase more inventory. Inventory, biomass, equipment: these purchases and obtainable results are also assets, and assets are most valuable in the borrowing process.

Keep collateral in mind and leverage what you have

There are several options to obtain funding if you have collateral in your business. Lenders will consider equipment, real estate and certain types of transferable inventory to reach your funding goals. Before you begin shopping, take a full account of the assets you possess and consider an asset(collateral)-backed loan.  

Real Estate is the best collateral to accessing the max-funding for your qualifications If you have equity in any real estate (non-primary, if residential), you may qualify for a cashout-refi on your property or a collateralized business loan. The more equity the better. If you need $500k and would only qualify for $40k based on your business annual income (10-20% of your annual), owning over $500k in equity on your property would qualify you for a loan amount worth the value of the submitted property or group of properties. 

If you are looking to purchase equipment or own equipment in which you have considerable equity, you may qualify for an equipment loan. Lenders are willing to lend specifically to the amount of the equipment you’d like to purchase, or refinance equipment you already own and have considerable equity in ($50k and up). 

Inventory is valuable in the cannabis industry because the inventory itself is very valuable. Biomass can be used as collateral as long as there is a secondary market to liquidate the assets in case of a default. Some investors and lenders will even consider certain licenses in a collateral package. 

The most important advice to note is that investors and lenders love assets. The more hard-assets on your balance sheet, the better. If your investors and lenders know their money will be spent on tangible, recoverable items, you will have a higher chance of securing funding.

Documents 

Keeping and providing proper documentation of your business and its finances is the most important part of the process. Depending upon loan amount requested, your required documents will vary. It is worth it to prepare the following documents for submission to your lender of choice:

  • Lender Application (separate applications may be requested for real estate or equipment lending options)
  • 6-12 Months of Bank Statements and Merchant Processing Statements
  • 1-3 Years of Business Financials including Tax Returns, Profit & Loss, and Balance Sheet, and Accounts Receivables Reports
  • 1-3 Years of Personal Financials including a Personal Financial Statement and Personal Tax Returns
  • A recent tri-merge credit report for all Principals
  • Business Debt Schedule including any short-term or long-term debt
  • An Organizational Chart that explains your business, verticals and any relationships between your legal entity and any subsequent companies.
  • Real Estate Owned Schedule (applicable if you have real estate to offer as collateral)
  • Equipment Owned Schedule (applicable if you have equipment to offer as collateral)
  • Drivers License and Voided Check (no matter what lending options you choose)
  • Documentation or Information on Inventory (applicable if you are considering inventory for collateral)
  • If cannabis related, Cannabis license information, if applicable

Time to Fund

In my experience, I’ve seen a million-dollar, short-term business loan deal close within a day of applying and I’ve seen real estate deals close after 3 grueling months of work for both the lender and the borrower. The timing will depend on how quickly you submit all documents requested among other loan-specific factors. Be prepared for potential site-inspections, bank verification, conference calls with investors, appraisals and other unique requests based on the due diligence necessary for your file. I’ve stated before in previous blogs and I will say it here for the NCIA community, try not to borrow in a pinch. If you need a large investment in a day or a week, please don’t be discouraged, your potential lender will hustle for your company, but have some patience and give yourself at least a week to lock in a term sheet, and at least 30 days to close on any loan besides unsecured short-term business financing.  

I hope this is an encouraging and helpful article that will bring you closer to applying for funding. If you’re not sure if you’ll qualify, always reach out the funding specialist of your choice or several specialists from several companies to find a lender you trust to work efficiently and honestly on your unique opportunity. Don’t forget to rally for SAFE banking so that this entire process will be easier and accessible to many more companies large and small within this amazing industry. 

 


Lilogy

Cheryl Dearborne is the Director of Marketing and Financial Services for credit-investment firm, Lilogy in New York City. Her time at Lilogy has seeded a deep passion for educating borrowers in an effort to increase borrower eligibility and credit-worthiness throughout the American community of small business owners, especially so in Cannabis as merchants within the industry have substantial obstacles stacked against them until Federal Laws offer equitable protection and benefits. 

 

NCIA Accepting Applications For 2020-22 Board of Directors Term

NCIA is accepting applications for eligible candidates to apply for its board of directors now through Friday, September 27, 2019.

The National Cannabis Industry Association is a nonprofit organization run for and by its membership, so we hope you’ll consider this opportunity to apply for a seat on the NCIA Board.

Serving on NCIA’s Board of Directors is no small task. Board members are responsible for overseeing the strategic direction of the largest and most influential cannabis industry organization in the country. Board Members are also responsible for building membership, fundraising, and ensuring that NCIA continues to be the strongest force advocating for the fair and equal treatment of the industry on Capitol Hill.

Learn more about our current Board Members

New Annual Board Selection Process

To ensure that the board makeup best reflects our membership, NCIA no longer requires board candidates to be Sustaining Members; all current NCIA members, at any level, are eligible to apply for a seat on the board. NCIA members who are interested and qualified to serve on our board are encouraged to submit an application for review by our nominating committee before the September 27 deadline. 

Candidates may apply directly for a board position during the open application process. The application form asks for information about the candidate’s professional background, unique talents, skills, and viewpoints, and ability to contribute or raise financial resources for NCIA.

Who Qualifies To Run For A Board Position?

To be considered for a seat on the board, a candidate must be a fiduciary (e.g. owner, president, CEO) of a current dues-paying Member business at any level of membership and must submit an application online by September 27. 

What Are The Requirements For An NCIA Board Member?

Board members serve two-year terms and are responsible for overseeing the association’s overall strategy and budget, assist in the development of strategic relationships, and as ambassadors of NCIA, they represent nearly 2,000 member businesses. In general, the NCIA board meets in person twice and conducts 2-3 video conferences per year.

What’s New About This Year’s Process For Nominations?

The new process allows any fiduciary (e.g. owner, president CEO) of a member business to apply to serve a two-year term on the Board of Directors.

The selection process will now be overseen by a Nominations Committee and a slate of candidates will be chosen. Candidates not chosen during the selection process may seek an independent nomination to go before a vote of the NCIA membership.

How Are The Board Positions Selected?

Once the application period closes, NCIA’s nominating committee will convene to carefully review and score all applications. The committee will ultimately select a slate of nominees to fill eight available board seats that are best suited to bring additional talent, resources, and diversity to our growing organization, based on their qualifications.

Our nominating committee will be comprised of the chairs of our 13 member committees as well as a select number of current board members whose terms are not expiring this year. 

NCIA Members will then be notified of the slate and provided instructions for obtaining an independent nomination. Independent candidates must get the signatures (electronic) of 5% of the membership in order to qualify for the ballot.

If no qualified independent candidates are received by November 27, the slate of nominees recommended by the Board of Directors shall be declared members of the Board of Directors and shall commence their term in January 2020.

If one or more qualified independent candidates qualify, all candidates will be presented to the membership for an election which will take place during the month of December.

APPLY FOR NCIA’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Watch The Webinar: Cannabis Extractions – Thoughts And Considerations

Learn more about cannabis extraction best practices, techniques, and methods in this webinar recording. Hear from speakers Dan Gustafik, President at Hybrid Tech, and Gene Galyuk, Chief Development Officer at Capna Systems.

 

 

 

Member Blog: What The Cannabis Market Can Learn From The Energy Sector About Overcoming Market Complexity

by Mike Elliott, Business Development Executive at DCM

In an industry where change is a constant, cannabis companies face big challenges when it comes to brand-building, communications, and bringing products to market. The sector’s complexity is only increasing, which is compounded by its continual evolution, along with tight, varied, fluctuating regulations, and in some cases, less-than-informed consumers. 

While the path forward may seem uncharted, in fact, similar market challenges exist in other verticals. With the right strategies and tools, these hurdles—including rigid regulatory conditions—can be overcome. If you’re looking for a roadmap for success, look no further than the U.S. energy sector – specifically, utilities. 

The recent shift toward deregulated electric and gas markets has created an environment strikingly similar to that of cannabis. Both sectors grapple with strict, unpredictable regulatory governance. Both must comply with state-by-state variances and prohibitive marketing. And both face the challenge of communicating with customers who are often unfamiliar with the sector’s legislation and production processes. 

By gaining an understanding of these obstacles, cannabis operators can improve their own market and regulatory navigation. Following are a few key lessons learned from energy.

 

  1. Changing regulations demand razor-sharp communications management

    For both energy suppliers and cannabis providers, regulation and compliance are determined at the state level. State-by-state laws vary widely and become increasingly complex when factoring in additional local and municipal regulations—not to mention continual review and change. This complexity has a direct impact on communications and brand management. Rules on communication and packaging—including, for cannabis, dosage—can diverge greatly and shift quickly. And there are few signs of this framework getting simpler.

Energy suppliers have addressed this complexity through variable, highly responsive communication platforms that can—very quickly and at scale—accommodate unique market requirements. 

For cannabis companies, similar success depends on razor-sharp management, including automation of intensive, often spreadsheet-based processes that are manually maintained and prone to error. Robust, technology-driven platforms can now deliver a wide array of materials efficiently and accurately across different markets, all while ensuring airtight compliance with each market’s specific regulations.

  1. New opportunities call for a fast, location-specific response

    Both energy and cannabis businesses must be agile and flexible when responding to new market opportunities. In adapting to fluctuating, state-by-state rules surrounding contract terms and conditions, energy providers have learned the hard way how inefficiency and error can delay market entry and reduce sales potential. 

Faced with similar circumstances, cannabis producers need the support of automated, location-specific marketing – technology that efficiently allows for customized, regional messaging across multiple markets and channels while ensuring locked-down branding and regulatory compliance. 

  1. Perception is everything when it comes to reaching consumers

    With deregulation, utility companies realized that many consumers were uninformed regarding the legislative changes and were unaware of product availability and their own ability to shop around. Educating consumers was key – and communicating to them a value proposition that would distinguish each provider’s offering from that of the competition. 

While cannabis is not entirely unfamiliar to many consumers, the dialogue around legalization and products remains similarly dogged by a lack of information and general misunderstanding. Cannabis companies must now shift those perceptions and educate potential customers on product safety and use. Producers must look at developing innovative communications supported by tools like automation, multi-channel communications management, and 1:1 marketing. These can help target, personalize, and monitor communications to better connect with consumers.

  1. With little room to communicate, companies need to get creative

    Utility companies are highly restricted in not only how they can make changes to billing and service charges, but also how they can market to consumers. The scenario is the same for cannabis companies, though regulations are even more complex and restrictive, with federal prohibition blocking most traditional means of advertising, including social and digital channels. 

Cannabis companies can combat these restrictions with genuinely creative thinking backed by a thorough understanding of the rules. That means combining market knowledge with creative expertise in a way that skillfully complies with regulations without breaking them. At the same time, creativity and customization cannot hinder efficiency. The right tools must be in place to make sure everything works together – for example, a platform that lets users customize branded collateral for different segments and channels, allowing for both efficiency and creativity – consistency and customization.

The bottom line: the stakes are too high for non-compliance

Fines for non-compliance in the energy sector can reach into the millions. Likewise, stiff penalties are levied for non-compliance in the cannabis industry. The financial implications can be devastating for cannabis producers – even more so if it comes to relabeling or pulling product from store shelves. To compound the risk, publicized mishaps can deliver a serious blow to consumer confidence for brands trying to win consumer trust.

With that in mind, navigating the highly regulated cannabis landscape takes careful planning, constant oversight, and the ability to stay ahead of evolving regulatory requirements. While the opportunity is promising, it requires tools, technologies, and strategies that streamline processes, mitigate risk, and increase speed-to-market. Charting your course depends on careful planning, trusted advice, and experienced partners – along with the ability to learn from those who have been there and done that. 


Mike Elliott is a Business Development Executive specializing in cannabis at DCM

From brand strategy and consumer insights to dynamic labeling and POS solutions, DCM helps build, protect, and bring to market North America’s largest cannabis brands. Learn more at http://www.datacm.com.

Member Blog: Compensation in Cannabis – Is The Data Actionable Or Just Interesting?

By Dan Walter, FutureSense LLC

Everyone wants to know how much to pay people (or how much to get paid.) In a world of instantly accessible google searches, it can be maddening that pay data for the cannabis industry is hard to find. Even when you locate information, it probably isn’t compelling (or legally compliant). What’s the problem and how do we fix it?

Here are the most basic rules:

FTC regulations require the information provided by survey participants (companies) to be based on data more than three months old. Actionable survey data can only be supplied for positions with more than five respondents. No individual participant’s data can represent more than 25 percent on a weighted basis of the reported statistic.

Any data that does not meet these minimum requirements is interesting but is unlikely to provide a solid foundation (or a legal defense). Data collected directly from employees or talent searches are almost always non-compliant.

Actionable survey data will also give you ranges for each position. At the very least, usable survey data will provide statistically relevant minimums, midpoints, and maximums for each position. More comprehensive data will usually provide quartiles or percentiles for each job. To be blunt. Median numbers are the playground of thin data. If all you see is a median, you are probably looking at data that isn’t actionable. The median may be interesting, but it isn’t much more than that.

Many providers in the cannabis industry have spent their time and money trying to help companies with better pay data. Some of the data is accurate, and some are not. Some of the data meets legal requirements, and some are just fun to have. How should a company decide which data is actionable and which is only interesting? The paragraphs above provide some insight into assessing the information out there. NCIA and FutureSense are working diligently to augment that information with a data set that respects the breadth and depth of the cannabis industry (truly an industry of industries).

This is what makes your participation in the 2019 NCIA Cannabis Compensation Study, powered by FutureSense, so important. We have executed pay surveys for decades. Our goal is to provide actionable data for every position in the cannabis industry. Your participation is crucial! Participation is simple, FutureSense does most of the work. Also, many of the industry HR, Recruiting, and Accounting service providers are already set up to submit your data quickly. 

Contact us today, or contact your service provider and ask them to collaborate for you! We will update this post as new providers get on board.

 

Committee Blog: The Employee Onboarding Process

by NCIA’s Human Resources Committee
Kara Bradford of Viridian Staffing, Kerry Arnold of Canndescent, Heidi Quan of Murchison & Cumming LLP, Nichole McIntyre of Urban-Gro, Michelle Whitmore of H2 Talent, and Mark Hackett of Emerge Law Group

You’ve found, interviewed, hired the right person for a position in your business, and they have just accepted your job offer. Congratulations! Now what? In the second part of our three-part series, the HR Committee shares insights on the Onboarding of employees. Onboarding new employees can be critical to ensuring happy and productive workers that understand the culture and expectations of your company. Having an organized procedure for bringing on a new hire is crucial for both the company and the new employee. Your company should be as prepared and ready as the new employee is expected to be for their first day. This can be a missed opportunity to make a great impression on your new employee.

In order to help your company with the onboarding process, a new hire checklist can be utilized to help ensure that you are covering all the necessary areas for a successful and smooth entry into your workforce. We have prepared two checklists for the onboard process. One is more administrative in nature while the other is designed to assist managers to help smoothly integrate and transition the new employee into your company. In some companies, a Manager may need to perform the tasks on both checklists if the company does not have an HR Manager.  

HR Manager Checklist

Starting with the HR Manager Checklist, it’s best to make sure that you’ve received a signed offer letter and/or employment agreement prior to the start date being determined. Some companies also prefer not to set a start date until the background check process has completed. Once this is completed, there are a series of steps to take prior to the new employee starting. You may need to order hardware/software, cultivation tools/equipment, etc. On their first day, it’s a best practice to have the worker complete all paperwork, including any W-4 documentation/I-9, etc, prior to starting on the job. We’ve also included instructions for I-9 completion

Data has shown that employees don’t leave companies, they often leave managers; so provide your managers with the resources they need in order to inspire more confidence in the new employee for their manager. If the Manager isn’t the individual filling out the paperwork with the employee, have the manager greet the employee as soon as necessary paperwork is completed. Having a manager focus their attention on a new employee as much as possible during that first day will help to solidify the new employee’s sense of belonging to the organization.  

Employee Onboarding Checklist For Managers

The manager should take time to introduce the new employee to all co-workers and other organizational stakeholders they may interact with while helping to familiarize them with the facility. The manager should then spend time setting/reiterating expectations of what the position entails and conveying any goals/metrics that the employee is required to meet. Finally, the manager should spend time training the new employee and setting them up for success, or delegating this to the appropriate subject matter expert on the team to do this. 

We often have companies tell us they are struggling to retain their employees. By providing an exceptional onboarding experience from the very first day, this will help the new employee to realize you value them and the talents they are bringing to your company, thus helping to feel welcomed and continue their contributions longer to your firm.  

In our next HR Committee Blog Post, we’ll provide a checklist with recommendations on how to handle Terminations.

Download The Onboarding Checklists Here:

HR Manager Checklist

Employee Onboarding Checklist For Managers

 

Member Blog: Cannabis Retailers – Help Advance Cannabis Research

by Lisa Conine, Community Outreach Coordinator at Om of Medicine

Medical cannabis retailers are in the unique position of having large amounts of data available to them in the form of medical cannabis patients. Four years ago, Om of Medicine partnered with researchers at the University of Michigan to develop an IRB-approved survey study examining medical cannabis patients and their opioid use. We conducted a survey of 244 medical cannabis patients in Michigan with chronic pain for 3 months. The goal was to collect data to examine if using medical cannabis for chronic pain affected one’s opioid consumption. We saw testimonial evidence of this every day in our consultation rooms and we wanted to quantify that evidence to elevate our patient’s voices and bring them to decision-makers.

The results of that study displayed a 64% reduction in opioid use and a 45% increase in quality of life. The Journal of Pain published this research in their 2016 edition and since, the findings have been used as a tool for engaging with medical professionals and elected officials. Additionally, the results have been cited in publications such as the 2017 edition for the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine’s report: Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids. Soon after, the results were sited in Representative Earl Blumenauer’s Physicians Guide to Cannabis-Assisted Opioid Reduction. Blumenauer’s office took the initiative to put this document together and circulate it to his colleagues throughout Congress. These findings are intended to be a tool for advancing our advocacy for this movement and the patients we serve. You can find the study here and you are encouraged to use these findings in your lobbying and education efforts!

Currently, Om of Medicine is continually working to increase research around medical cannabis patient’s experiences. We now have launched our third IRB-approved study examining patient’s daily regimens, their knowledge on cannabis, and their relationship to their medical health care team. We are calling on the cannabis industry to help us increase our patient data set by circulating the IRB-approved survey to any networks you have with medical cannabis patients. 

The survey is quick to complete and is completely confidential. The published work is intended to be used as a tool for all working in the industry and movement to use it as a piece for engagement with policymakers and doctors. 

If you have any questions, you can reach me at lisa@omofmedicine.org. Sending out sincere gratitude to NCIA and participants who take this survey to aid in the advancement of understanding this plant and its revolutionary potential.

TAKE THE SURVEY


Lisa Conine is the Community Outreach Coordinator for the Om of Medicine, a medical cannabis dispensary in downtown Ann Arbor. Lisa works to prioritize relationships with Om’s local community non-profits, businesses, medical professionals, and elected officials. Outreach at Om is based in social justice and forwarding the cannabis movement by uplifting the work of partnering community organizations, providing education on cannabis to the public, and engaging politically, on all levels, to create sensible policy. Lisa is also a member of the newly formed NCIA Retail Committee.

WEBINAR: METRC – How to Stay Ahead & Maximize Efficiency

Everyone has METRC on the mind. Find out how METRC will impact your retail operations, what you’ll need to consider when it comes to compliance reporting, and how to maximize efficiencies to ensure being METRC certified doesn’t cost you precious time better spent running your business. Watch the webinar recording here.

 


 

SPEAKERS:

Jocelyn Sheltraw
Director of Regional Strategy, Headset

Brett C. Hartmann-Payan
Compliance Officer, Dosist

Anne Forkutza
VP Strategic Partnerships, Cova

This site uses cookies. By using this site or closing this notice, you agree to the use of cookies and our privacy policy.